Newborn Drug Testing Policies, Risks, and Rights

Dr. Tom Leaver
Brittany Ferri
Written by Dr. Tom Leaver on 09 January 2026
Medically reviewed by Brittany Ferri on 12 January 2026

Around 20% of pregnant people engage in substance use in the U.S. Substance use during pregnancy can cause adverse effects for the fetus, and once born, they can exhibit withdrawal symptoms. If a newborn tests positive for drugs, the consequences can be severe, with family separation and termination of parental rights.

Newborn Drug Testing Policies, Risks, and Rights

Why newborns are drug tested

Newborns are drug tested if there is concern that they might have been exposed to illicit substances during the pregnancy. Individual policies and procedures for newborn drug testing vary between hospitals. Some examples of scenarios that might trigger newborn drug testing include:

  • Known maternal substance use.
  • No prenatal care.
  • Signs of possible withdrawal or unexplained behavioural changes in the newborn.

There is often a discrepancy between self-reporting of substance use and positive drug tests. Neonatal drug testing helps to establish what substances the newborn has been exposed to during pregnancy. These results allow informed medical and legal decisions to be made about the newborn’s ongoing care.

The federal framework: CAPTA and Plans of Safe Care

The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) is the key federal legislation around newborn drug testing. CAPTA was updated in 2016 and includes the Plan of Safe Care (POSC), which ensures the well-being of infants affected by substance misuse.

Following a positive newborn drug test or if an infant is affected by substance use, such as showing withdrawal symptoms, healthcare providers are required to notify Child Protective Services (CPS). A caseworker will then make a thorough assessment of the infant and family, helping to determine if any maltreatment has happened and what follow-up action is required.

How state laws and hospital policies differ

Newborn drug testing varies considerably across state legal systems and hospital policies. State policies vary from criminalization to public health emphasis. For example, Tennessee criminalizes drug use during pregnancy, while Alabama and South Carolina permit prosecution under existing child endangerment laws. In contrast, some states, including Michigan and Kentucky, do not prosecute drug use in pregnant people and focus more on child welfare and public health approaches.

Hospitals typically use either universal or risk-based testing. Universal screening tests all newborns for drugs, whereas risk-based testing screens only those who meet specific criteria. Universal screening helps to prevent biased protocols, but at an increased cost. Risk-based testing is more common, but it opens the door to prejudice, with Black mothers and newborns being significantly more likely to be subjected to drug testing.  

There have been cases where newborns have been taken away from their parents after testing positive for a prescription medication with a valid use, for example, opioids for chronic pain. This raises significant ethical concerns regarding newborn drug testing. 

Potential benefits of newborn drug testing

Early detection of prenatal substance exposure with newborn drug testing allows clinicians to make individualized treatment plans and follow-up care for infants. This early intervention can help minimize the short and long-term effects of substance exposure.

Newborns experiencing withdrawal may require specialized care, so identifying these individuals can allow the appropriate treatment to be initiated sooner. Drug testing can also help identify those who might otherwise be missed, as maternal drug-use disclosure is often unreliable.  

Risks, harms, and equity concerns

There are several possible risks and harms associated with newborn drug testing. Positive results could occur due to taking prescription or other legitimate medications, which on occasion could even be drugs that were given in labour. As mentioned, the data shows a clear inequity with newborn drug testing, with Black families being disproportionately affected.  

Given that families could be separated based on these results, this is very concerning. As a result, the fear of drug testing is a big deterrent for people engaging in prenatal care, which can have other consequences for the pregnancy.

Despite the importance of newborn drug testing, there are still important ethical considerations. Informed consent remains inconsistent across hospitals and is a controversial topic. Newborn drug testing can sometimes occur without their parents' knowledge or consent if there is sufficient concern from medical professionals, although every effort should be made to gain consent. This can cause parents to feel blindsided by medical professionals, leading to distrust.

Parents should know that medical professionals may want to conduct a drug test for a variety of reasons, and it does not mean they think you are a bad parent. The drug test can be performed on different samples, including the umbilical cord, meconium, or urine.

A positive drug test generally triggers a mandatory report to CPS, which can lead to investigations and potential family separation. Testing results and subsequent reports become part of official records that may affect custody decisions. While parents do generally have the right to refuse a newborn drug test, this is likely to lead to legal action depending on state law.

If you're pregnant and using substances

If you're pregnant and struggling with substance use, seeking help is crucial for both you and your baby’s health. Mothers who wish to stop using substances during pregnancy will require medical assistance to help minimize health risks to themselves and their baby. Many programs offer specialized services for pregnant women, providing individualized treatment plans to help increase the chance of a successful recovery. It's recommended to reach out to a medical or mental health professional as soon as you’re able. 

Moving toward compassionate policy

There are calls to reform newborn drug testing policies to emphasize treatment over punishment, particularly in view of families being separated unjustly. Current policies are fuelling stigma around substance use in pregnancy, and might be preventing people from accessing the help they need. Policy changes are required to ensure health equity for Black families and eliminate CPS reporting when no concern for child abuse and neglect exists.

Resources:

  1. Bruzelius, E., Underhill, K., Askari, M. S., Kajeepeta, S., Bates, L., Prins, S. J., Jarlenski, M., & Martins, S. S. (2024). Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use in the United States: A survey of state policies and systematic review of their public health impacts. International Journal of Drug Policy, 126, 104380.
  2. Farst, K. J., Valentine, J. L., & Hall, R. W. (2011). Drug testing for newborn exposure to illicit substances in pregnancy: Pitfalls and pearls. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2011, 1–7.
  3. Shetty, C., Oshman, L., Costa, A., Waidley, V., Madlambayan, E., Joassaint, M., McCabe, K., Townsel, C., Wu, J. P., Frank, C. J., & Chandanabhumma, P. P. (2024). Structural racism in newborn drug testing: Perspectives of health care and child protective services professionals. The Annals of Family Medicine, 22(4), 271–278.
  4. Georgia families say newborn drug testing law is punishing parents for legal prescriptions. (Oct 2025) 11alive.
  5. Cotten, S. W. (2012). Drug testing in the neonate. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 32(3), 449–466.
  6. Plans of Safe Care Infants With Prenatal Substance Exposure and Their Families - West Virginia. (Nov 2024). Child Welfare Information Gateway.
  7. How States Handle Drug Use in Pregnancy. (2015). Propublica.
  8. Price, H. R., Collier, A. C., & Wright, T. E. (2018). Screening pregnant women and their neonates for illicit drug use: consideration of the integrated technical, medical, ethical, legal, and social issues. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 961.
  9. Substance Use During Pregnancy and Child Abuse or Neglect: Summary of State Laws. (2022). Legislative Analysis and Public Policy Association.

Activity History - Last updated: 12 January 2026, Published date:


Reviewer

Brittany Ferri

PhD, OTR/L

Brittany Ferri holds a PhD in Integrative Mental Health and is an occupational therapist, health writer, medical reviewer, and book author.

Activity History - Medically Reviewed on 09 January 2026 and last checked on 12 January 2026

Medically reviewed by
Brittany Ferri

Brittany Ferri

PhD, OTR/L

Reviewer

Recovered Branding BG
Ready to talk about treatment? Call today. (833) 840-1202
Helpline Information

Calls to numbers marked with (I) symbols will be answered or returned by one of the treatment providers listed in our Terms and Conditions, each of which is a paid advertiser.

In calling the helpline you agree to our Terms and Conditions. We do not receive any fee or commission dependent upon which treatment or provider a caller chooses.

There is no obligation to enter treatment.

Access State-Specific Provider Directories for detailed information on locating licensed service providers and recovery residences in your area.

For any specific questions please email us at info@recovered.org

Related articles